Results for: "minmax"

When there is an invalid block with a keyword missing an end right before another end, it is unclear where which keyword is missing the end

Take this example:

class Dog       # 1
  def bark      # 2
    puts "woof" # 3
end             # 4

However due to github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/issues/32 the problem line will be identified as:

> class Dog       # 1

Because lines 2, 3, and 4 are technically valid code and are expanded first, deemed valid, and hidden. We need to un-hide the matching end line 4. Also work backwards and if there’s a mis-matched keyword, show it too

Parses the most indented lines into blocks that are marked and added to the frontier

Compile a InstanceVariableAndWriteNode node

Compile a InstanceVariableOperatorWriteNode node

Compile a InstanceVariableOrWriteNode node

@foo &&= bar

becomes

@foo && @foo = bar

@foo ||= bar

becomes

@foo || @foo = bar

@foo += bar

becomes

@foo = @foo + bar

Dispatch enter and leave events for InstanceVariableAndWriteNode nodes and continue walking the tree.

Dispatch enter and leave events for InstanceVariableOperatorWriteNode nodes and continue walking the tree.

Dispatch enter and leave events for InstanceVariableOrWriteNode nodes and continue walking the tree.

Copy a InstanceVariableAndWriteNode node

Copy a InstanceVariableOperatorWriteNode node

Copy a InstanceVariableOrWriteNode node

The logical inverse of ‘capture_last_end_same_indent`

When there is an invalid block with an ‘end` missing a keyword right after another `end`, it is unclear where which end is missing the keyword.

Take this example:

class Dog       # 1
    puts "woof" # 2
  end           # 3
end             # 4

the problem line will be identified as:

> end            # 4

This happens because lines 1, 2, and 3 are technically valid code and are expanded first, deemed valid, and hidden. We need to un-hide the matching keyword on line 1. Also work backwards and if there’s a mis-matched end, show it too