Results for: "minmax"

foo in bar ^^^^^^^^^^

foo => bar ^^^^^^^^^^

/(?<foo>foo)/ =~ bar ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

foo => ^(bar)

^^^^^^

foo = 1 and bar => ^foo

^^^^

class << self; end ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

__ENCODING__ ^^^^^^^^^^^^

__LINE__ ^^^^^^^^

foo += baz ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

foo &&= baz ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

foo ||= baz ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

@foo ^^^^

@foo = 1 ^^^^^^^^

@foo, = bar ^^^^

/foo #{bar}/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^

@foo &&= bar

becomes

@foo && @foo = bar

@foo ||= bar

becomes

@foo || @foo = bar

@foo += bar

becomes

@foo = @foo + bar

The logical inverse of ‘capture_last_end_same_indent`

When there is an invalid block with an ‘end` missing a keyword right after another `end`, it is unclear where which end is missing the keyword.

Take this example:

class Dog       # 1
    puts "woof" # 2
  end           # 3
end             # 4

the problem line will be identified as:

> end            # 4

This happens because lines 1, 2, and 3 are technically valid code and are expanded first, deemed valid, and hidden. We need to un-hide the matching keyword on line 1. Also work backwards and if there’s a mis-matched end, show it too

foo += baz ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^