def copy: (**params) -> ArrayNode
def deconstruct: () -> Array[nil | Node]
def deconstruct_keys
: (keys: Array) -> Hash[Symbol, nil | Node
| Array | String
| Token
| Array | Location]
def contains_splat?: () -> bool
def opening: () -> String
?
def closing: () -> String
?
def inspect(inspector: NodeInspector) -> String
Sometimes you want to check an instance of a node against a list of classes to see what kind of behavior to perform. Usually this is done by calling ‘[cls1, cls2].include?(node.class)` or putting the node into a case statement and doing `case node; when cls1; when cls2; end`. Both of these approaches are relatively slow because of the constant lookups, method calls, and/or array allocations.
Instead, you can call type
, which will return to you a symbol that you can use for comparison. This is faster than the other approaches because it uses a single integer comparison, but also because if you’re on CRuby you can take advantage of the fact that case statements with all symbol keys will use a jump table.
def type: () -> Symbol
Similar to type
, this method returns a symbol that you can use for splitting on the type of the node without having to do a long === chain. Note that like type
, it will still be slower than using == for a single class, but should be faster in a case statement or an array comparison.
def self.type: () -> Symbol
def initialize: (constant: Node
?, requireds: Array, rest: Node
?, posts: Array, opening_loc
: Location
?, closing_loc
: Location
?, location: Location
) -> void
def accept: (visitor: Visitor
) -> void
def child_nodes
: () -> Array[nil | Node]
def copy: (**params) -> ArrayPatternNode
def deconstruct: () -> Array[nil | Node]
def deconstruct_keys
: (keys: Array) -> Hash[Symbol, nil | Node
| Array | String
| Token
| Array | Location]
def opening: () -> String
?
def closing: () -> String
?
def inspect(inspector: NodeInspector) -> String
Sometimes you want to check an instance of a node against a list of classes to see what kind of behavior to perform. Usually this is done by calling ‘[cls1, cls2].include?(node.class)` or putting the node into a case statement and doing `case node; when cls1; when cls2; end`. Both of these approaches are relatively slow because of the constant lookups, method calls, and/or array allocations.
Instead, you can call type
, which will return to you a symbol that you can use for comparison. This is faster than the other approaches because it uses a single integer comparison, but also because if you’re on CRuby you can take advantage of the fact that case statements with all symbol keys will use a jump table.
def type: () -> Symbol
Similar to type
, this method returns a symbol that you can use for splitting on the type of the node without having to do a long === chain. Note that like type
, it will still be slower than using == for a single class, but should be faster in a case statement or an array comparison.
def self.type: () -> Symbol