Results for: "fnmatch"

Returns the node id for the given backtrace location.

begin
  raise
rescue =>  e
  loc = e.backtrace_locations.first
  RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree.node_id_for_backtrace_location(loc)
end # => 0

@return [Object] most up-to-date dependency in the possibility set

@macro action

No documentation available
No documentation available

Processes the topmost available {RequirementState} on the stack @return [void]

Creates and pushes the initial state for the resolution, based upon the {#requested} dependencies @return [void]

@param [Object] possibility a single possibility @param [Array] requirements an array of requirements @return [Boolean] whether the possibility satisfies all of the

given requirements

@param [Object] requirement @return [ResolutionState] the state whose ‘requirement` is the given

`requirement`.

Add the current {#possibility} to the dependency graph of the current {#state} @return [void]

(see Gem::Resolver::Molinillo::SpecificationProvider#requirement_satisfied_by?)

Ruby expects the dylib to follow a file name convention for loading

This method verifies that there are no (obvious) ambiguities with the provided col_sep and strip parsing options. For example, if col_sep and strip were both equal to \t, then there would be no clear way to parse the input.

No documentation available
No documentation available
No documentation available
No documentation available

Raises a VersionConflict error, or any underlying error, if there is no current state @return [void]

Pushes a new {DependencyState} that encapsulates both existing and new requirements @param [Array] new_requirements @param [Boolean] requires_sort @param [Object] new_activated @return [void]

No documentation available

@return [Boolean] where the requirement of the state we’re unwinding

to directly caused the conflict. Note: in this case, it is
impossible for the state we're unwinding to to be a parent of
any of the other conflicting requirements (or we would have
circularity)

Filter’s a state’s possibilities to remove any that would not satisfy the requirements in the conflict we’ve just rewound from @param [UnwindDetails] unwind_details details of the conflict just unwound from @return [void]

Attempts to update the existing vertex’s ‘PossibilitySet` with a filtered version @return [void]

Pushes a new {DependencyState}. If the {#specification_provider} says to {SpecificationProvider#allow_missing?} that particular requirement, and there are no possibilities for that requirement, then ‘state` is not pushed, and the vertex in {#activated} is removed, and we continue resolving the remaining requirements. @param [DependencyState] state @return [void]

Ensures any raised {NoSuchDependencyError} has its {NoSuchDependencyError#required_by} set. @yield

Search took: 9ms  ·  Total Results: 1850